如果有VAR,1990世界杯决赛会是什么结果?(假如当年有VAR,1990世界杯决赛会怎样收场?)

2026-02-09
浏览次数: 次
返回列表

Analyzing potential penalties

n的飞铲属

I want to keep things concise and maybe use bullet points for clarity. There's a note about Germany having a disallowed goal, and I should mention that Argentina had a strong penalty appeal for a foul on Calderón by Kohler at the 83rd minute. Some think Argentina deserved a penalty earlier as well. To avoid inaccuracies, I’ll phrase it as “Argentina also had one notable penalty shout,” but I'm careful not to assert specifics if I'm uncertain.Recalling key incidents

auto

I want to show my knowledge while keeping it concise. In the 58th minute, there was a foul by Augenthaler on Sensini. Most retrospective analyses suggest that the awarded penalty is justifiable. The red cards for Monzón and Dezotti due to serious foul play and violent conduct stand firm. There are no other clear events likely to change the outcome. I’ll summarize it as "大概率仍是德国1-0阿根廷" and I'll keep the formatting simple and use bullet points.

to

大概率仍是西德 1–0 阿根廷。

干净

  • 决胜点球:Sensini铲倒Völler判罚争议不小,但有明显接触;按VAR“清晰且明显错误才推翻”的标准,多数情况下不会改判,判罚大概率维持。Brehme点球命中不变。
  • 红牌:Monzón对Klinsmann的飞铲属于严重犯规,VAR回看通常仍给直接红牌;Dezotti的拉拽/报复性动作也会维持红牌。阿根廷仍以少打多。
  • 其他点球呼声:双方各有零星争议场面,但缺乏“清晰且明显”的证据来触发改判,难以改变走势。

综合VAR介入逻辑与赛后回看结论,比赛过程细节或更“干净”,但比分结果很可能不变。

搜索